Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Stop Blaming Capitalism for Government Failures
By Yaron Brook and Don Watkins
Speaking of the financial crisis, French president Nicolas Sarkozy recently said, “Laissez-faire is finished. The all-powerful market that always knows best is finished.”
Sarkozy was echoing the views of many, including president-elect Obama, who assume that the financial crisis was caused by free markets--by “unbridled greed” unleashed by decades of deregulation and a “hands off” approach to the economy. And given this premise, the solution, they say, is obvious. To solve this crisis and prevent another one, we need a heavy dose of Uncle Sam’s elixir: government intervention. Whether it’s more bailouts, stricter regulation, a new round of nationalizations, or some other scheme, the only question since day one has been how, not whether, government is going to intervene.
And the issue is wider than the financial crisis. Millions of Americans don’t have health insurance? Well, says Obama, that’s because we’ve left the health-care system to the free market. The solution: a complete government takeover of medicine. A few companies engaged in accounting fraud? It must be because we didn’t impose enough regulations on businessmen. The solution: rein in corporations with Sarbanes-Oxley.
But while capitalism may be a convenient scapegoat, it did not cause any of these problems. Indeed, whatever one wishes to call the unruly mixture of freedom and government controls that made up our economic and political system during the last three decades, one cannot call it capitalism.
Take a step back. In the lead up to the “Reagan Revolution,” the explosive growth of government during the ’60s and ’70s had left the American economy in disarray. A crushing tax burden, runaway inflation, brutal unemployment, and economic stagnation had Americans looking for an alternative. That’s what Reagan offered, denouncing big government and promising a new “morning in America.”
Under Reagan, some taxes were reduced, inflation was subdued, a few regulations were relaxed--and the economy roared back to life. But while markets were able to function to a greater degree than in the immediate past, the regulatory and welfare state remained largely untouched, with government spending continuing to increase, as well as some taxes. Later administrations were even worse. Bush Jr., often laughably called a champion of free markets, presided over massive new governmental controls like Sarbanes-Oxley and massive new welfare programs like the prescription drug benefit.
None of this is consistent with capitalism. As the economic system that fully recognizes and protects individual rights, including the right to private property, capitalism means, in Ayn Rand’s words, “the abolition of any and all forms of government intervention in production and trade, the separation of State and Economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of Church and State.” Laissez-faire means laissez-faire: no welfare state entitlements, no Federal Reserve monetary manipulation, no regulatory bullying, no controls, no government interference in the economy. The government’s job under capitalism is single but crucial: to protect individual rights from violation by force or fraud.
America came closest to this system in the latter half of the nineteenth century. The result was an unprecedented explosion of wealth creation and consequent rise in the standard of living. Even now, when the fading remnants of capitalism are badly crippled by endless controls, we see that the freest countries--those which retain the most capitalist elements--have the highest standard of living.
Why then should capitalism take the blame today--when capitalism doesn’t even exist? Consider the current crisis. The causes are complex, but the driving force is clearly government intervention: the Fed keeping interest rates below the rate of inflation, thus encouraging people to borrow and providing the impetus for a housing bubble; the Community Reinvestment Act, which forces banks to lend money to low-income and poor-credit households; the creation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with government-guaranteed debt leading to artificially low mortgage rates and the illusion that the financial instruments created by bundling them are low risk; government-licensed rating agencies, which gave AAA ratings to mortgage-backed securities, creating a false sense of confidence; deposit insurance and the “too big to fail” doctrine, whose bailout promises have created huge distortions in incentives and risk-taking throughout the financial system; and so on. In the face of this long list, who can say with a straight face that the housing and financial markets were frontiers of “cowboy capitalism”?
This is just the latest example of a pattern that has been going on since the rise of capitalism: capitalism is blamed for the ills of government intervention--and then even more government intervention is proposed as the cure. The Great Depression? Despite massive evidence that the Federal Reserve’s and other government policies were responsible for the crash and the inability of the economy to recover, it was laissez-faire that was blamed. Consequently, in the aftermath, the government’s power over the economy was not curtailed but dramatically expanded. Or what about the energy crisis of the 1970s? Despite compelling evidence that it was brought on by monetary inflation exacerbated by the abandonment of the remnants of the gold standard, and made worse by prices controls, “greedy” oil companies were blamed. The prescribed “solution” was for the government to exert even more control.
It’s time to stop blaming capitalism for the sins of government intervention, and give true laissez-faire a chance. Now that would be a change we could believe in.
If you agree with this line of thinking, there are some great sources out there for reading.
Ayn Rand Institue
Ludwig von Mises Institute
Campaign For Liberty
We've seen "the fall of the U.S." theories...
And of course "the death of free-market capitalism" calls...
Laissez-Faire Capitalism Should Be as Dead as Soviet Communism
Again, awfully light on substance. Its so easily to rip on free-market capitalism during recessions, but people often forget about the wealth created by capitalism which probably is the reason the writer had a job to begin with. Some like to have it both ways. Its easy to tear down a system when its vulnerable, but it isn't really the system, but rather those manipulating it. We don't really have free-market capitalism, but rather a government that works for special interests.
Here's a good opinion piece that digs through this argument, and makes some valid points:
Capitalism Is Worst System Except for the Rest
Here are some important quotes from this piece:
Before you can declare free markets a failure, you have to establish that they exist, says Paul Kasriel, chief economist at the Northern Trust Co. in Chicago.
“We do not have free markets in credit in the U.S. or anywhere else that I know of,” he says. “The price of short- term credit is fixed by central banks. It would only be by accident that a central bank would fix the price of short-term credit” at the precise level that a free market would.All sorts of unintended consequences flow forth from central bankers’ fixing of a short-term rate. Hold the rate too low, and it leads to a misallocation of capital into, say, housing or dot- com stocks. That’s what happened in the late 1990s and again in the early part of this decade.
“We are now experiencing the economic and financial market fallout from (Alan) Greenspan’s interference with the free market,” Kasriel says.
One supposed nail in capitalism’s coffin is the assertion that deregulation created the problems. This is curious, given that banks, which are at the root of the credit crunch, are among the most highly regulated institutions.
“There is a small army of people overseeing the banking industry,” says Paul DeRosa, a partner at Mt. Lucas Management Corp. in New York. And yet “we’ve had a banking crisis every 15 years since 1837. The number of people devoted to regulation doesn’t seem to matter.”
Regulators from the Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Controller of the Currency and New York State Banking Commission are “on the premises 365 days a year,” he says.
The regulatory structure may have been antiquated and overlapping. That’s no excuse for the regulators to be caught napping.
Censuring the free market is a way of deflecting blame from the true source, according to Dan Mitchell, senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington.
“The genesis of the problem is bad government policy,” Mitchell says, pointing to everything from easy money to “affordable lending schemes” to the “corrupt system of subsidies from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” to the tax code’s favorable treatment of debt (the interest is deductible) versus equity.
Fannie’s and Freddie’s generous campaign contributions (anywhere else, these would be called bribes) encouraged Congress to look the other way as the two housing finance agencies used their implicit government guarantee to increase their leverage and buy riskier mortgages.
To me, this is an important piece of the puzzle. Clearly there were some major mistakes made, and they will change the landscape of the financial industry forever, but lets think twice before we declare capitalism dead.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
As a whole, I tend to agree with this thesis. China has the resources, specifically people. They have a huge young population that is moving to its cities. They are also a nation of producers meaning they will always be exporting goods, or at least until someone makes them cheaper. I've heard Jim Rogers say time and again that selling China today is like selling America in 1908. I believe he's right.
Article: U.S. Woes Open Door for China
Source: Wall Street Journal
Some things we learned in 2008:
- You really can't trust analysts and other so-called "experts." Most are just playing the Wall Street game in which the goal is to pull as much money into the system as possible. These experts are actually just market cheerleaders who all benefit from "assets under management" in some capacity.
- For individual investors, 2008 represented a change in strategy from Buy-and-Hold, to Buy-and-Hope, to Buy-and Hold Your Nose, to What the heck happened to my money?
- When true market panic hits, there are no safe havens for your money. Commodities provided insulation for quite awhile, but when there is a global recession, energy prices, agriculture prices, and basic materials all experience demand destruction. Cash became risky as well as we saw negative yields on treasuries, bank failures, and a weakened dollar. Gold experienced swings with global currencies weakening against the dollar and investors speculating. US multinational corporations, which did wonderful in 2007, finally weakened as the global economy slowed, the weak dollar stopped contributing to earnings, and credit was much harder to come by.
- Companies we thought we conservative by nature fell into the same trap of chasing extra earnings by taking on excessive debt and risk. You can look back at every market crash and subsequent economic decline, and they are all manifested by the same factors: Excessive debt, increased risk, too much speculation, and people engaging in business outside their circle of competence (for example, mortgage-backed securities, CDO's etc).
- You cannot create prosperity through false growth. Inflating assets above their true value only creates bubbles and the increased wealth doesn't last. Few people end up profiting in the end, and many people lose.
- Although bailouts help to calm panic, they rarely work, as they typically condone the risky behavior that got the company in that position to begin with. It will be almost impossible to track where the money truly is going, and its doubtful we'll get it back. Its impossible to decide who deserves a bailout, and who does not. Once you allow politicians to start spending additional taxpayer dollars, they won't stop. We'll see a lot more taxpayer dollars going out to who knows where in 2009. We should not reward backward-thinking management that cannot adapt to the changing global economy.
- Its very difficult to invest when the rules are constantly changing. To paraphrase Mark from Fund my Mutual Fund, investing in the current environment is like playing football with the goal posts constantly moving. This has become a traders market, as things change by the hour.
- The world is much more inter-connected then we thought it was. European and Asian markets have been impacted just like the U.S. has, and there was no dislocation from what was thought to be a "US problem."
Looking ahead to 2009, there are a ton of question marks, and few certainties. Here's a few things I see happening in our world in 2009:
- The economy is in for a rough year. If 2008 was the year that the financial industry took a major hit, 2009 will be the year the economy gets hit. We're going to see a lot more unemployment, and this won't be able to help other areas of the economy such as housing, retail and credit. In order for people to pay off debt and start buying things again, they need steady income because we're not a nation of savers.
- Luxury goods will continue to be swapped for generic-type names. Just as late 2008 was good for Wal-Mart and McDonalds, 2009 will see that trend continue. People are going to stop paying twice as much for a Mac than a PC. Discount retailers will continue to see increased business, and specialty retailers who are more expensive will continue to lose sales. Not out of choice, but necessity.
- Obama's economic stimulus plan will help cushion the blow in employment and GDP will come out better than it would have. But its not necessarily real growth. The stock market will rally a few times, especially in infrastrucutre stocks, as more details are reveled about where the money is being spent.
- We'll continue our push to alternative fuels, but it will be dampered by the lack of capital and lower energy prices. Money is needed to fund research and building of these projects, and although it will continue, it will be slowed. Lower energy prices also replace the extra incentive to switch sooner. Speculation will still be engaged among solar, wind, and other various stocks, but volatility will remain. Stock declines will be good opportunities to pick at small positions if you're so inclined.
- The stock market will rally at various times throughout 2009 when there is a lack of news, or during the economic stimulus period, but nothing sustained. I think we'll retest our market lows, and at some point take another move down. This will be impacted by how bad unemployment gets and if more industries and local governments need taxpayer assistance. I believe we're going to see consumers strapped, and local governments running out of money. These types of event are what will shock the market in 2009 as opposed to 2008 when it was investment banks. At this time, I see no compelling reason to buy stocks other than fairly attractive valutions. Until we get a better picture of earnings, and how emerging markets will perform, its difficult to buy with much conviction. I do think Chinese stocks (as well as a few other emerging countries) will be worth buying again, but they may not recover for awhile. Obviously US blue chips will be good buys, but there isn't a huge hurry to get in as I think we'll see cheaper prices. Focus on companies with little to no debt, and companies that don't rely on debt to finance operations, or to make profits. The fundamentals of most financial companies have become impaired, and it will impact earnings for awhile.
- It will be a tough year for the economy and many people, but the U.S. will pull through. For the most part, we have a nation of optimists with a strong resolve and work ethic. It may take some time, but it will get better, I'm fully confident in that. The U.S. will play a different role in the world during the next couple of years and beyond, but thats not necessarily a bad thing.
I hope you all have a wonderful holiday season, and a healthy and prosperous 2009!
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Surprising magma find captivates geothermal scientists
Three developments in the geothermal world this month have caused more excitement in the field than these rock lovers tend to see in half a year. First up, drilling engineers accidentally tapped into a magma chamber in Hawaii while searching for new geothermal energy sites, geologists reported last week. The exceedingly rare discovery occurred in a geothermal field that was under development for power production.
The magma find provides an unexpected window into the process by which rock from the ocean floor forms into continental rock. Most of Hawaii is made of cooled lava, called basalt, which also makes up some of the ocean floor. The magma, however, is composed of elements that are more similar to the geology of continental rock, rather than basalt. Discerning the differences between the two types of rock could be key to unraveling the secrets of how continents form. A geoscientist quoted by National Geographic described it as his own Jurassic Park, on par with finding dinosaurs frolicking in the wild. The only downside is that the significance of the magma site for scientific research may sideline efforts to build more geothermal power plants for Hawaii. But never fear, the geothermal energy field is practically thriving right now. Two new plants are about to begin producing power in Nevada, with production capacity of about 65 megawatts. That's enough energy to cover roughly 40,000 households and cuts carbon-dioxide emissions by about 300,000 tons of CO2 per year, says Enel North America, the company financing the plants. A typical coal plant produces about 500 MW of elecitricity, so the two new facilities aren't exactly the stuff of legend. However, many geothermal plants start small and then get expanded once they prove themselves by consistently producing power. And in Africa, where geothermal energy production has long been viewed as a promising but far off technology, it may have just gotten a big boost. Preliminary studies, reported at the climate talks in Poznan, Poland, have found that the Rift Valley in East Africa could develop about 4,000 MW of electricity. Historically, geothermal energy has routinely been hindered by the high costs of drilling. With data as overwhelmingly positive as this, however, geothermal developers may finally start to sniff out a business plan for Africa.
Although the economic troubles are causing energy exploration funds to dry up a bit, renewable portfolio standards are going to force states to spend money on new forms of power generation. I'm going to keep an eye on geothermal as I believe its one of the best sources and has a lot of potential.
Credit is not wealth: it is at best someone else's wealth. At worst, credit
is purely fabricated currency.
The same mistakes that were made during the Great Depression are being made
now. The call to prop up prices will grow to a din as the self-interests of
businesses push themselves on the Federal Reserve and Treasury.
The business and economics establishment will soon call for a new New Deal,
and all the socialist policies of FDR will be dusted off and respun to the
unwitting public, and the years that follow will be ones of pain, high prices,
and a real fall in the standard of living.
As long as our central government has the ability to dole out these favors,
there will be special interests lining up to receive them.
Its important to look back at history when making the economic decisions that will impact tomorrow. Unfortunately, our leaders in Washington become so wrapped up in the short term effect, and perceived effect, that they can't even see what they're doing to the future.
Friday, December 19, 2008
A crumbling economy, more than 2 million constituents who have lost their jobs this year, and congressional demands of CEOs to work for free did not convince lawmakers to freeze their own pay.
Instead, they will get a $4,700 pay increase, amounting to an additional $2.5 million that taxpayers will spend on congressional salaries, and watchdog groups are not happy about it.
The full article, if you need to read any more.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
-Fund managers are trying to salvage what has been a horrendous year for most. With lighter trading volume because a lot of money has been pulled from the market, its easier to make stocks move higher with less trading right now. These guys would like to make their yearly numbers look a little better if they can.
-Obama's stimulus plans are driving up stocks that may not even benefit. There have been some pretty big figures thrown out there (I've heard as high as $850 billion), but there has been no real specific detail. We've heard "infrastructure" and thus anything related to that industry has been trading with some strength.
-Take a look at last year. We had a steady stock rally around this same time. And this was when there were very few perceived risks compared to now. Do I have to remind anyone what happened last January?
Is this trade-able right now? Yes. Traders are making some money right now. But there is too much negative on the economic side, and there is probably more coming, so I can't say I'm putting much money into the market yet.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Almost a third of hedge funds will shut or merge after the $1.5 trillion industry posted its worst ever performance this year, according to IGS Group, which advises hedge funds on raising money.
“The failure rate is going to go up, the closure rate is going up, and the merger rate is going up,” IGS Chief Executive Officer John Godden said in an interview in London. “It’s going to be a 30 percent wipe out.”
It's all part of the cycle of deleveraging. All this is going to do is take away more capital from the market, and quite frankly that's what it needs most. In the next administration, I'd imagine we're going to see a lot more regulations for hedge funds, as well as less tax loopholes. These funds will still be the preferred investment vehicle for high net worth individuals and endowments, but without question, the industry is going to go through some changes.
Swiss electrical-engineering company ABB Ltd. (ABB) said Tuesday it won a
$87 millionorder in the U.S. to expand the capacity of the power transmission system.
ABB said the order is to expand and strengthen the power transmission network in the area of
Los Angeles, California, so that it can deliver more electricity from renewable sources.
This is exactly the type of order I've been expecting ABB to get. I think we will see many more as alternative energy projects are rolled out in the next couple of years.
Link to the press release.
Disclosure: Long ABB
Friday, December 12, 2008
"Without giving specific names, most of the significant American banks, the larger banks, are bankrupt, totally bankrupt," said Rogers, who is now a private investor.
"What is outrageous economically and is outrageous morally is that normally in times like this, people who are competent and who saw it coming and who kept their powder dry go and take over the assets from the incompetent," he said. "What's happening this time is that the government is taking the assets from the competent people and giving them to the incompetent people and saying, now you can compete with the competent people. It is horrible economics."
"Governments are making mistakes," he said. "They're saying to all the banks, you don't have to tell us your situation. You can continue to use your balance sheet that is phony.... All these guys are bankrupt, they're still worrying about their bonuses, they're still trying to pay their dividends, and the whole system is weakened."
Something to think about as the US ponders the next round of bailouts, this time to the automakers.
A bit about the company:
-ABB is a leader in power and automation technologies that enable utility and industry customers to improve performance while lowering environmental impact. The ABB Group of companies operates in around 100 countries and employs about 120,000 people.
They operate in five segments: Power products, power systems, automation products, process automation, and robotics. Click here for a description of each.
ABB has attracted a lot of attention within the past couple of years because of its global reach, particularly in emerging markets. According to their website, in Q3 of 2008 orders were broken down in this fashion:
- Europe 43%
- Asia 28%
- Americas 21%
- Middle East and Africa 8%
Positives for the company:
- Their businesses are in industries where there is currently a lot of focus among governments and private corporations. Governments are trying to replace old power grids and promote energy efficiency through stimulus spending and tax credits. Private corporations and utilities are spending money on alternative energy products like solar and wind power and need solutions from companies like ABB to pull these projects together.
- Their growth is coming from emerging economies. Many are cash rich and have growing populations with a consistent need for these products.
- The U.S. is likely to build or upgrade their power grid to integrate alternative energy products and increase efficiency. ABB is likely to play some role in this, and it could be a large one. Another stock that could play a role is Quanta Services (PWR). Obama's likely energy department head has already pitched the idea:
Here are some links with more detail on this potential project:
WSJ Enironmental Capital Blog Post.
Common Tragedies Blog Post.
Negatives for the company:
- We are in what appears to be a significant recession. Funding for additional projects typically gets cut off during economic slowdowns. There is no evidence that growth won't slowdown for ABB.
- Emerging economies haven't been spared by what was thought to be a "US problem." Many emerging countries are seeing economic slowdowns as strong or worse than the U.S.
- Energy prices have dropped. Funding for alternative energy projects might get shelved with fuel prices falling across the board.
The stock hasn't been spared during the recent economic turmoil. It was slashed from a high of $33 earlier this year to around $10. It has rallied a bit in the past week with other infrastructure stocks after Obama's preliminary plan was announced.
They have a lot of cash on the balance sheet and should have no problems weathering the economic turmoil.
Earnings are expected to be flat with estimates for 2008 being $1.67 and 2009 being $1.65. They could rise substantially if the economy recovers in 2009, and could see a boost from infrastructure spending in the U.S.
Valuation wise, the stock is cheap. Its trading at less than 7x 2008 earnings.
I think the stock is a good buy at current levels. To me it is more attractive than its competitors, GE (GE) and Siemens (SI), as both have some problems right now. GE has a lot of financial exposure and isn't a direct play on the industry like ABB. Siemens is facing some profitability issues and needs some re-structuring. I'd take a look at Quanta Services, but the stock carries a pretty good premium at 22x earnings. Overall, I like ABB the best in this industry.
Disclosure: Long ABB
-In the close-knit hedge fund community, where confessions of a mistake are rare, billionaires Louis Bacon, Kenneth Griffin and Paul Tudor Jones are retreating from borrowed-money bets, private equity and emerging market debt and championing more transparent stocks, bonds and currencies.
Hedge funds got into the same cycle of "everyone's doing it, so we need to to stay competitive." But with massive losses and forced selling due to fund redemptions, Hedge funds now will get back to basics, and this should help to stabilize the market a bit.
I wrote about hedge funds and their potential problems this earlier this year. These funds help create asset bubbles with excess leverage, and they increase market volatility by swapping in and out of stocks and sectors with lightning speed.
-“Managers got away from their core expertise as they got bigger and had to put the money to work,” said Brad Balter, whose Boston-based Balter Capital Management LLC invests in hedge funds. “The industry lost its way, and this is a reset.”
So deleveraging is happening all over. And although its painful, it is absolutely necessary. The same holds true for financial institutions, and in some ways the auto industry. If your model isn't working, a bailout will only prolong the inevitable collapse. The strongest companies are those who can take prudent risks, but avoid falling into the trap of excess leverage.
Full Bloomberg article here.
My August '08 post about hedge funds.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
- From late September into early November, portfolio, mutual and hedge fund managers faced a wave of redemptions. With the stock market in free fall thanks to a global economic and credit crisis, and banks making all types of investors aggressively rein in their leverage levels, this push of redemptions helped erase more than a decade of gains for the Standard & Poor’s 500. All told, TrimTabs Investment Research posted mutual fund outflows of more than $80 billion in the five weeks ended Oct. 29.
- But in the last few weeks, the wave of money that had been coming out of mutual funds and portfolios has started to trickle back into the market, albeit slowly. In the week ended Nov. 26, for example, mutual funds posted $10.4 billion in inflows, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average marking a 6% gain for the period.
- “We’ve seen some meaningful flows on a daily basis into our funds. And we’ve seen it throughout the last couple weeks as it’s been net inflow mode for a couple of weeks now,” said Michael Petroff, a portfolio manager with mutual fund company Heartland Advisors.
This doesn't necessarily bode well for the stock market though. This is mostly due to no great options for investing cash.
- For example, interest in ultra-safe U.S. Treasurys has surged in recent days to the point that the yield on the three-month T-bill traded at 0.007% recently and even briefly dipped below zero Tuesday.
I doubt many investors are excited about borrowing money to the government interest free. I believe that many investors are more likely to be talked into jumping back in the market with the lack of other options.
The period of forced selling due to fund redemptions appears to have pretty much slowed. This should help to slow down the market volatility, which should bring back more individual investors.
Of course all of this will take time, but this is part of the process of de-leveraging.
The main reason for the trade, which is OPEC's likely production cut next week, has been noticed by many traders. In fact, the strength in these stocks suggest that it might be worth selling the hype on this trade. I'm thinking this mainly because there are very few compelling reasons to buy stocks or sectors right now, and lots of people are looking at this trade. I do believe OPEC will make a major cut in order to increase oil prices, but if it doesn't exceed expectations, which are now heightening, these stocks could sell off again. Its a situation to monitor closely. If you're in on this trade, I'd probably use a trailing stop. That way if the news is good, you still own the stock, but if it disappoints, you can lock in some profit.
Here's the closing prices and current prices of stocks mentioned Monday:
National Oilwell Varco (NOV): Mon: $22.37 Current: $27.31
Schlumberger (SLB): Mon: $40.78 Current: $43.93
Exxon Mobil (XOM): Mon: $79.60 Current: $81.70
Noble (NE): Mon: $23.51 Current: $27.00
Transocean (RIG): Mon: $54.25 Current: $61.45
Disclosure: Long NOV
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Of all the alternative energy sources being discussed, I think geothermal gets the least amount of discussion, especially considering the positives.
For those who don't know, geothermal energy is energy from heat stored in the earth. It is captured in various ways, but it typically involves drilling into the earth's core and extracting hot water and steam from different depths.
There are a couple of big advantages with geothermal.
1)To start, fuel isn't needed to heat or cool a home, or generate electricity. This cuts down on the need for fossil fuels to be burned.
2)Geothermal is competitive price-wise. There are extensive upfront costs, but for generating electricity, its similar to wind and much cheaper than solar. For home systems, it typically cuts yearly costs dramatically, and takes 5-10 years to payoff, depending on the size of your system.
3)The big advantage it has over wind and solar is its ability to provide base load power. This basically means it runs 24/7. Base load is the minimum amount of electricity that utilities need to supply for things to run. This is HUGE. The wind doesn't always blow, the sun doesn't always shine, but the earth's heat doesn't shut off.
Combining 24/7 geothermal with other various sources can provide a workable combination for power generation. Plus, you can use the same land for multiple uses often times. In the U.S., the best areas for geothermal are on the West coast, which is also the best areas for solar power. It is feasible to run geothermal below ground and solar above ground on the same land.
So where does that put us as investors? Through my research, the best company I've found is called Ormat Technologies (ORA). Company Description: It operates in two segments, Electricity and Products. The Electricity segment develops, builds, owns, and operates geothermal and recovered energy-based power plants, and sells electricity. The Products segment designs, manufactures, and sells equipment for geothermal and recovered energy-based electricity generation; and remote power units and other power generators, including fossil fuel powered turbo-generators and heavy duty direct current generators.
Some positives for the geothermal industry:
-The states are taking the lead by passing Renewable Portfolio Standards requiring specific amounts of energy be derived from renewable sources by a specific date. California is one of the first to kick in with 20% required by 2010. 27 states have taken on this plan, and geothermal should play a big role. Plus, the entire world is taking on many mandates like this, and Ormat supplies products and services worldwide.
-The federal government will be rolling out programs to stimulate renewable energy. First, there's Obama's economic stimulus plan coming in 2009, and geothermal should fit into it somewhere. There are also tax credits for businesses and individuals to adopt these programs.
-There is a lot of funding and venture capital floating around for renewable energy programs. Google has been a big proponent of geothermal, via their philanthropic wing, google.org. They've given over $10 million in grants to research geothermal power.
As for Ormat's stock, its expensive, but cheaper than it was six months ago. With oil prices dropping and the economy weakening, many renewable projects are being put on hold, but it should come back stronger, and soon. The stock is trading at 20x 2009 projected earnings. They are estimated to grow earnings from $1.10 in 2008 to $1.51 in 2009, via consensus estimates. I don't currently own the stock, but I'd look at taking a position if the price gets a little more attractive. Overall, I'm a buyer of geothermal energy and I think it will play a big role in the world's transformation to renewable energy.
Here's a good article about the benefits of geothermal.
Also, a presentation via Ormat's website (PDF).
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
"Hence Mr. Obama's emphasis over the weekend on spending on "infrastructure" -- build roads, modernize schools, expand Internet access, improve buildings' energy efficiency, put better technology in hospitals."
"The need for a big economic jolt means "we can't worry short term about the deficit," Mr. Obama said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "We've got to make sure that the economic stimulus plan is large enough to get the economy moving."
I'm not sure how much of the money is going into the "build roads" part of the conversation. I think we're going to see investment in internet infrastructure to help make a network of collaboration. Also, I believe a lot of it will be geared toward energy efficiency. New heating and lighting systems in government buildings, and encouraging businesses to do the same through tax credits.
Based on what I've read, I also think there is going to be some federal money to jump start the alternative energy movement. My guess is Washington is going to help invest in a new or updated power grid. This will allow rural areas, which can help in power generation (wind and solar power are often generated in remote areas) to be connected to the cities that need the power.
As an investor, I'd be looking in those areas. Internet Infrastructure: How about Cisco (CSCO). I think Google (GOOG) is going to play a role in this as well. Take a look at www.google.org for some of their ideas.
Power Grid: You have to think of GE (GE) a bit here, but they're too big for me. I've been behind ABB (ABB) for awhile in this space, and I think its a good buy here.
Its anybody's guess for solar stocks. I think the industry as a whole will get promoted, but the stocks aren't cheap. I'd probably look for an ETF here.
Also, I like geothermal energy. Its much cheaper than solar and is pretty accessible right now. I'm going to do a specific post about this, but the stock I'm looking at for this is Ormat Technologies (ORA).
Here's some more reading about Obama's plan.
Disclosure: Long GOOG,ABB.
Monday, December 8, 2008
The pattern I see here is:
A) Right now-oil stocks oversold with oil prices around $40.
B) OPEC cuts production. Oil moves to somewhere between $50-75/barrel. Oil stocks rally.
C) Rally wears off, sometime early 2009. Stocks fall again as recession-caused demand destruction continues. Oil stocks back to current levels.
By the way, this is also the pattern for financial stocks, and homebuilders, and automakers. We're seeing a potentially trade-able pattern, but a pattern of lower highs and lower lows.
For the trade, take a look at the usual suspects:
National Oilwell Varco (NOV)
Exxon Mobil (XOM)
Thursday, December 4, 2008
I always look at it this way: The stock market is pricing in the state of the economy around six months from now. Right now there is no sign of stabilization in the economy, so the market is still quite volatile. But while the economy might take a little while to recover, the stock market will make is quickest move as soon as it looks like things are done deteriorating.
For the first time in decades, the yield on the S&P 500 is higher than the 10 year treasury . This signifies pretty strong value in current stock prices.
The question you have to ask yourself when looking at today's prices is not will the stock market be higher in a month or two, but will it be higher in a year, or three years, or ten years? I believe the market will be significantly higher, and if you're investing with a time horizon above a couple of years, its a good time to buy.